When it comes to repeated reading
and fluency improvement, which is better: repeated word reading or repeated
passage reading? Therrien and Kubina make the position that repeated practice
with connected text is a critical component for increasing fluency.
The researchers conducted a study
where the participants read contextual and acontextual words. They found that when students re-read words
in context, they read faster and made fewer errors. The students’ reading speed increased and the
number of word errors decreased as they re-read the connected text
passage. They concluded that their study
provided support for the contextualized linguistic effect for reading fluency
and word recognition.
There are several practical
implications from their research:
·
Re-reading words in context of passages is more
efficient for instruction than re-reading just words out of context.
·
Word recognition improves with practice.
·
When re-reading connected text, phrases and word
patterns can become so familiar so as to be automatic.
As I am always
looking for ways to make my limited instruction time more efficient, I
introduce vocabulary and difficult words before reading a passage and point
them out where they appear in the text.
I find the students rarely hesitate when they then read the word in
context. Additionally, context helps
with high frequency words when students have the surrounding words to cue
decoding. Thus, when it comes to
answering the initial question above, the answer appears to be that reading
words in context of a passage is more effective for increasing fluency than
rapid proficiency with isolated words.
APA Citation for
the article:
Therrien, W. J., & Kubina, R. M.,
Jr. (2007). The importance of context in repeated reading. Reading
Improvement, 44(4), 179-188.
No comments:
Post a Comment